What to choose amd or intel. Which is better than AMD or Intel, including for games: comparison of AMD and Intel processors

Let's see what are the main differences between the processors of the world leaders - Intel and AMD.

We will also consider their positive and negative sides.

Major CPU manufacturers

Everyone understands perfectly well that the market computing technology there are two leading companies that design and manufacture the Central Processing Unit, or more simply, processors.

These devices combine millions of transistors and other logic elements, and are electronic devices the highest complexity.

The whole world uses computers, the heart of which is an electronic chip either from Intel, or, therefore, it is no secret to anyone that both of these companies are constantly fighting for leadership in this area.

But let's leave these companies alone and move on to ordinary user, which faces the dilemma of choice - which is still preferable - Intel or AMD?

Say what you like, but there is no definite answer to this question, and there cannot be, since both manufacturers have huge potential, and their CPUs are capable of meeting the current requirements.

When choosing a processor for your device, the user primarily focuses on its performance and cost - relying on these two criteria as the main ones.

Most of the users have long been divided into two opposing camps, becoming ardent supporters of Intel or AMD products.

Let's consider all the weak and strengths devices of these leading companies, so that when choosing a certain of them, rely not on speculation, but on specific facts and characteristics.

Pros and cons of Intel processors

So what are the advantages of an Intel processor?

• First of all, it is very high performance and performance in applications and games, which are most optimized for Intel processors.
• Under the control of these processors, the system operates with maximum stability.
• It should be noted that the memory of the second and third levels in Intel CPUs operates at higher speeds than in similar processors from AMD.
• An important role in performance when working with optimized applications is played by multithreading, which is implemented by Intel in such CPUs as.

Pros and cons of AMD processors

• The advantages of AMD processors, first of all, are their affordability in terms of cost, which is remarkably combined with performance.
• A huge plus is the multi-platform, which allows you to replace one processor model with another without the need to change motherboard.
• That is, a processor designed for socket AM3 can be installed on socket AM2 + without any negative consequences.
• It should also be noted that multitasking, with which many AMD processors do an excellent job, simultaneously performing work with three applications.
• In addition, the FX series processors have quite good overclocking potential, which is sometimes badly needed.

• The disadvantages of AMD's CPUs include higher power consumption than Intel's, as well as operation at lower cache speeds of the second and third levels.
• It should also be noted that most of the processors belonging to the FX line require additional cooling, which will have to be purchased separately.
• And one more disadvantage is that fewer games and applications have been adapted and written for AMD processors than for Intel.

Latest connectors from Intel

Today, many of the leading CPU manufacturers are equipped with two current connectors. Intel has the following:

• LGA 2011 v3 is a combo connector that is focused on the online assembly of a high-performance personal computer for both servers and the end user. The key feature of such a platform is the presence of a RAM controller that successfully operates in multi-channel mode. Thanks to this important feature, they are characterized by unprecedented performance with such processors. It must be said that an integrated subsystem is not used within such a platform. Unlocking the potential of such chips is possible only with the help of discrete graphics. For this, only the best video cards should be used;
• thanks to LGA, you can easily organize not only a high-performance computing system, but also a budget PC. For example, socket LGA 1151 perfect for creating a computing station with an average price policy, at the same time it will have a powerful built-in graphics core of the series Intel Graphics and support DDR4 memory.

Latest AMD connectors

AMD is promoting the following processor sockets today:

• the main computing platform for such a developer is AM3 +... The most powerful CPU is considered to be the FX lineup, which includes up to eight computing modules. In addition, this platform supports an integrated graphics subsystem. However, this is where the graphics core goes into the motherboard rather than being integrated into semiconductor crystals;
• most recent current AMD CPU socket - FM3 +... AMD's new CPUs are aimed at desktop computers and media centers not only at the entry level, but also at the intermediate level. Thanks to this, the most modern integrated solution will be available to the average user for a fairly small amount.

Work opportunities

Many people pay attention to the price of the processor first. It is also important for them that he can easily solve the tasks assigned to him.

So what can both organizations offer on this point? AMD is not known for its outstanding achievements.

On the other hand, this processor presents an excellent price / performance ratio. If you set it up correctly, you can expect stable operation without any complaints.

It is worth noting that AMD has managed to implement multitasking. Thanks to such a processor, various applications are easily launched.

With it, you can simultaneously install the game and surf the endless expanses of the Internet.

But Intel is known for more modest results in this area, which confirms the comparison of processors.

It will not be superfluous to pay attention to the possibility of overclocking, during which the performance of the AMD processor can be easily increased by twenty percent compared to the standard settings.

To do this, you just need to use additional software.

Intel beats AMD in almost everything except multitasking. In addition, Intel has always worked with high level.

Power consumption

Energy consumption is one of the important criteria for laptop owners. This is due to the fact that with low power consumption the device will work longer without the need for recharging.

In addition, during such work, there is a slight generation of heat, which also affects the service life of the main components of the PC.

We should also say about performance. After AMD acquired ATI, its creators were able to successfully integrate most of the graphics processing capabilities into the processor cores. These efforts have paid off successfully.

Those who use an AMD chip for games should have no doubt that they get good performance, which is much better than equivalent Intel chips (this is especially true for those who use a card with ATI graphics).

If it comes to a lot of multitasking, then it is better to opt for Intel, since it has HyperTreasing technology.

However, this advantage can only be used when software application able to support multitasking, that is, the ability to divide tasks into several small parts.

If the user needs a gaming processor, it is better to combine AMD processor with.

So there is a big difference between intel and amd processor sockets. When choosing a suitable option, consider the differences between them, listed in this article. This will greatly simplify the selection of the appropriate option.

The main differences between processors

The difference between Intel and AMD processors lies primarily in the sockets - the sockets in which they are installed.

When choosing a motherboard, you must first of all pay attention to this fact, since you simply cannot find a compromise solution.

AMD processor sockets

Motherboards designed for AMD processors must have the following sockets - AM3 and AM3 +.

Buying or assembling a computer on their own, most often they pay attention to hDD, the amount of RAM and cPU... The CPU is responsible for the performance and stability of the entire system, and it does all the basic calculations. Simple user processors from Intel and AMD are available. Their architecture is very different, each with its own strengths and weaknesses.

Intel was founded by Robert Noyce in 1968. And they started with the Intel 8008 microprocessor. Now the company is actively promoting the latest developments and is a leader in the development of processors.

Their direct competitor AMD (Advanced Micro Devices) appeared a year later with the participation of Intel. At first, she was engaged in the production of microprocessors, but relations with Intel deteriorated and the companies fled. Since then, they have been eternal rivals in the computer microprocessor market.

Intel chips - expensive and fast

Today crystals of this brand are leading in all respects. They are produced in budget option Pentium and Celeron for universal socket LGA1151 and top-end i7 for socket LGA2011-v3.

Intel pros

1. Stable performance under any load and high performance in an active application (archiver, graphics editor, game).
2. Optimized for many modern games, so performance and frames per second will be higher than that of a similar AMD.
3. Not a bad overclocking potential.
4. Debugged technology of multithreading and virtualization.
5. The work of the processor memory at the lower levels is very good.
6. Low power consumption and operating temperature.

disadvantages

1. The price even for basic models is higher than AMD counterparts, the cost of i3, i5, i7, i9 models is very high.
2. Frequent change of sockets for a crystal connector and their non-interchangeability - to install a powerful processor, you will need to change the motherboard.
3. Sensitive to cooling, especially during overclocking.

On a note! Intel processors do not lose their technical characteristics even after 3-5 years, when a new line or computer game comes out. The old ones continue to do their job well and do not strain the PC user.

An interesting video on the comparison of Intel and AMD processors

AMD processors - catch up and overtake

AMD is doing well, and in some niches they are treading on Intel's heels. The strongest position is in the segment of inexpensive crystals.

Benefits

Today their strengths are as follows:

1. Excellent cost / performance ratio, the price for the processor is 1.5-2 times lower than that of competitors.
2. Multiplatformity has been successfully solved, when almost the entire line of processors can be installed on the popular AM2 + and AM3 sockets.
3. The number of physical cores in a die is more than that of a similar one from Intel, so work with several applications at once is well implemented.
4. All series have a high overclocking potential.

Weaknesses of AMD Crystals

1. The multithreading in the kernels is not fully debugged, there are problems in the work of powerful graphics editors - AutoCad, Illustrator, Compass 3D and other programs.
2. It interacts worse with rAM.
3. High power consumption and the need for a powerful cooler, prone to strong heating with a standard cooling system.

CPU overclocking and power consumption

All manufacturers set the clock speed at a level that will allow the processor to work as long and reliably as possible. Users who are not satisfied with this artificially increase the number of operations per second by overclocking the microchip.

In overclocking, AMD devices have always been in the lead. Even the base A series model for 1400 rubles is overclocked, and the FX processors can reach frequencies of 13 GHz. It is imperative to replace with more productive ones with this procedure.

Intel can only overclock the Pentium line. He lends itself well to this operation and can increase his performance by 20-25%. Modern Core models with chips of 8 or 10 cores noticeably outperform powerful chips from AMD in performance. Overclocking somewhat equalizes the situation, but Intel is in the lead by the sum of indicators.

AMD chips are used to produce the best embedded graphics cards that outperform Intel's HD Graphics series. A6 processors are an excellent budget solution for multitasking processes, and with proper overclocking, they correspond to the i5 indicators, but will be 2 times cheaper.

Let's compare power consumption using the example of popular chips. Intel Pentium G3258 and A6-7400K have the same power - 53 watts, but Intel performs better in graphics tests. This indicates its efficient operation with less heat, but the AMD processor in similar conditions has a much harder time, and the cooling system is forced to work at maximum.

The same situation applies to all AMD chips - they consume more power and get hotter. For this reason, they are rarely used in applications where battery life is important.

Video - AMD vs. Intel: Which Is Better?

Processor selection

Recently, Intel has strongly pushed its competitor in all segments. Even AMD's transition to the new Zen architecture does not help, but there are segments where they are still very strong. The approximate choice of processor for a personal computer can be divided into 3 groups:

1. The first group is budget models. Any inexpensive chip from Intel or AMD can be used (Athlon, Sempron, A4). The difference in performance between them will be negligible, but the price can vary greatly.
2. The second group is graphic editors and multimedia systems. In this segment, models of the A6 and Trinity series from AMD or Intel G series chips and others are good.
3. The third group is powerful gaming devices and graphics programsworking with discrete 3D graphics. The choice here is obvious: in the middle price range, we choose AMD processors of the FX series or Core i3 from a competitor. There is no alternative to the i7 and i9 chips in the maximum configuration.

Every user, even not particularly versed in the technical side of the matter, sooner or later inevitably comes to the realization that the performance of his computer is beginning to be insufficient for solving everyday tasks, which are becoming more and more demanding on computing power day by day. Laptop owners will most likely close this issue for themselves by purchasing a new one. laptop.

Users of desktop PCs, especially those who themselves assembled it from components, probably will not take such radical decisions and will pay attention to upgrade.

Installing additional memory sticks, using faster SSD - disks - all this, of course, is wonderful, but nevertheless, it is customary to give the main role in increasing PC performance to the processor. There is no need to guess what a computer user with an outdated processor will do, he will just go to the store and buy a newer and faster chip. At the same time, owners of PCs based on Intel will get an Intel chip, the same ones who had it installed AMD , will give preference to AMD.

Why is it so? Because it is a tradition, a habit, and for some it is a sacred belief that a processor from one manufacturer is sure to surpass another in all respects. This latter opinion is mostly subjective and can be challenged, although the discussion on this topic is unlikely to be productive. Fierce controversy between supporters Intel and AMD have been going on for more than one year and are likely to continue. And the point here is not so much in the stubbornness of opponents, but in the fact that to give an unambiguous answer to the question of which is better, Intel or AMD , impossible.

Someone will say, they say, processors Intel became more widespread, therefore, they are better, otherwise the first place would go to AMD... This is not true. It just happened historically that marketers Intel turned out to be faster, but everything could have been different and most programs would have been written today not under Inteland under AMD... Moreover, with AMD several unfounded myths are connected, in particular the myth that processors from this company "Burn" , it is worth giving a slightly increased load. Yes, there were precedents, remember Athlon 1400, but they are not related to the processors themselves, but to the failure of the fan.

Today, with few exceptions, all this is in the past and is considered as an argument against AMD can not. Both Intel and Amdish processors have their advantages and disadvantages, which manifest themselves under certain circumstances, therefore, it is possible to judge whether a particular processor is good or bad only within the framework of the task it performs. Below you can familiarize yourself with the main advantages and disadvantages of processors. Intel and AMD, look and decide for yourself what is better based on your goals.

Pros of Intel processes

Most of the software is optimized for Intel chips.
Better gaming performance than comparable AMD chips.
When allocating resources, a large part is allocated to active applications, which makes the latter work faster.
Lower power consumption.
Good overlocking potential of index chips K .
High-quality interaction with RAM.

Cons of Intel processors

Limitations in terms of multitasking. They can work only with two resource-demanding applications.
Processors i7-i5 with index K require better cooling.
Forced full PC upgrade when installing a new chip line (excluding chips with LGA 115 socket) .
High price.

Pros of AMD processes

Affordable price, good value cost and performance.
Multitasking. More flexible distribution of computing power between running applications.
Multiplatform support.
Not a bad overclocking potential of some models, but in general, any chip can be overclocked by 10-20 percent AMD.

Minuses aMD processors

AMD chips are worse at handling data from applications written under Intel.
Insufficient cooling of the series chips Fx and Phenom II X4-X6 needing additional coolers.
Higher power consumption.
Interaction with RAM is not set at such a high level as in Intel.
Reduced performance in games when compared with Intel counterparts.

What general conclusions can be drawn based on the above? If the computer is supposed to be used only for office work, then you can give preference AMDbecause why pay more? On the other hand, Intel there are more than enough budget processors, which, like AMD, will easily cope with the tasks assigned to them. So by and large there is no difference, except for the price, on the basis of which processor you will build your office computer.

In the case of a multimedia PC, everything is a little more interesting, although here, too, there is a special advantage from choosing in favor of AMD or Intel you will not receive. If the assembly does not imply discrete graphics card, then you should pay attention to APU Trinity from AMD, if there is nothing without a discrete card, then it is better to give preference to Intel processors. As for gaming computers, then everything again depends on what games you are going to play and, accordingly, on which card is installed on the computer.

Suitable for games and mid-range graphics cards and AMD, eg, Phenom II X4 955 BE , if there are several video cards or the graphics card is very powerful, then it is still better to choose processors Intel i5-i7 with index TO ... Not because Intel is faster in principle, but because the allocation of resources to a specific application is its chip. In any case, count on a particularly noticeable performance gain when moving from AMD on Intel or with Intel on AMD not worth it, it will be obvious on benchmarks, but it can hardly be felt during real work.

Quite recently, the issue of competition between Intel and AMD processors was actively discussed by those interested: gamers and overclockers were ready to defend their preferences in network wars, all lines of processors from both manufacturers were tested on test benches. Today, with the development of the mobile electronics segment, in which processors from both Intel and AMD are very poorly represented, the relevance of comparison has become a thing of the past. However, you can still hear advice on choosing one or another manufacturer, sometimes completely categorical. The user who purchases the system in assembly or independently carries out the upgrade, still does not know what to give preference to. While the differences between Intel and AMD processors are far from obvious, knowing the main comparison points can help optimize your system.

• Identifying Intel and AMD Processors
• Comparison of Intel and AMD processors
• The difference between Intel processors and AMD processors

Identifying Intel and AMD Processors

Intel processors - microprocessors manufactured by the American corporation Intel, used in portable and stationary personal computers. Today they occupy about 80% of the market, several lines are considered relevant, models of which demonstrate varying degrees of performance.

AMD processors - microprocessors manufactured by the American corporation Advanced Micro Devices. Used in stationary and portable systems... AMD does not independently manufacture components, but only develops and orders from third-party manufacturers. Today, AMD has a market share of about 20%.

Comparison of Intel and AMD processors

What's the difference between Intel and AMD processors? The fundamental difference between Intel and AMD processors is the sockets, or sockets, into which they are installed. In this case, there is no compromise cross-platform, and there cannot be, so for a certain motherboard with a given set of characteristics, the choice between manufacturers is not worth it. Today for AMD, AM3, AM3 + sockets, as well as sockets for a processor with an integrated graphics core FM1 and FM2 are relevant. Intel today offers processors for LGA 1155/1156 and LGA 2011 sockets. If processors for AM3 + are compatible with AM3, then LGA does not imply a replacement option. It is worth noting that the relevance is very relative, since it concerns only the sale of the corresponding components in Russian stores, and not production.

Many models of processor lines from both manufacturers with very different characteristics do not allow comparing Intel and AMD in terms of the performance of their products. In the budget segment, represented today by processors with integrated graphics (it is also considered as a solution for mobile systems), AMD with the Trinity line turns out to be cheaper (with the same clock frequencies) than the lower generation Sandy Bridge from Intel. Avoiding a discrete graphics card is a real way to save money on office and home systems that do not run resource-intensive applications. If the cost criterion is not the main one, then Sandy Bridge wins somewhat in performance, primarily due to the larger volume of the third-level cache. The next generation Ivy Bridge already outperforms Trinity in terms of computing power, even when comparing dual-core and quad-core models, respectively. The graphics cores of the hybrid processors are more powerful from AMD, so for the budget game system you can recommend Trinity or the cheapest Llano.

If a user plans to set serious tasks for his system, for example, video processing, then AMD Vishera (FX) processors, thanks to their optimized work with multiple threads, even outperform the top Core i7 in tests. The price difference is around $ 130, so the benefit in AMD's offering is clear.

As for the power consumption, which can be a serious selection criterion for an overclocker, the AMD line of processors cannot boast of economy: even mobile Trinities produce immodest 65 watts.

The difference between Intel processors and AMD processors

1. AMD processors other than APUs are compatible with AM3 and AM3 + sockets, intel processors require installation in one type of LGA socket.
2. AMD processors are cheaper while maintaining the basic specifications.
3. Intel processors show better computing performance in benchmarks
4. AMD APU graphics are more powerful.
5. AMD Next Generation (FX) processors are optimized for multithreading.
6. Intel processors are more energy efficient.

Call or directly on the site! Our experts will be happy to help you!