Perhaps, more precisely, the entire state of today transmits the concept of "Information War". Of course, the edge of this war is information about Warman Southeast Ukraine, a real, terrible, insane. But for the edge there are other layers, more or less bright, with uneven borders, are quite relevant to certain audiences - political, national, patriotic, sports, religious, etc. I think that Christians in relation to information wars should be a special position.

Distinctive features

In my understanding of the war has a fundamental difference from discussions, disputes, fights, and any confrontation. She, like an ancient moloch, is sacrificed to himself for the emergence of people. Alive, real, those whom we call name, those whose face whose glance is the roads, those whom we loved or loved. War requires victims for himself! And people with joy, like an ancient sick, bring each other's eerie meal and ourselves!

War almost does not accept such a concept as "nearby", she does not have a human face. All is nothing more than chess pieces, albeit different weights. War lives with the black and white division "His" / "Alien". Moreover, "their own" must prove "silence", otherwise they are "strangers".

The information war also requires victims. It is clear that not people, not their lives, although it happens. It sucks life values, meanings, worldview, worldview, faith, personal relationship, freedom, love. This informational molefield feeds on the most humane in man. He, just like a terrible creature, the Dementor from the fairy tale about Harry Potter, sucks his soul from a person if a life is understood under the soul. Black and white consciousness, depreciating human life in comparison with the "right" ideas, a worldview, painting peace, like a chessboard, the labeling of everyone is everything that remains from a free, bright, multifaceted, filled with meaning and warm livelihoods.

The precipitated fortress

I think that information wars are based on a simple idea and are not intended to disinformation "enemy". The main thing in the information war is the upbringing in people of the worldview and the system of relations of the "siege fortress". And in his people!

In practice, as I see, the informational war solves two tasks: to introduce into the minds of people a lie and force the ordinary people to live on the principle of "Fear of the eyes of great", that is, to include self-censorship, black and white perception, a kind of information filters so that it Be sure to see in the surrounding reality threat.

The ideology of the "precipitated fortress" is very effective. It quickly carries out among the freedom limited in whose interests and with limited resources, and therefore the possibilities. The infallible life of ordinary people needs justification and internal precision compensation and dissatisfaction. The "precipitated fortress" rebuilds the worldview and through it removes responsibility and gives a sense of superiority. The victims of the information war themselves give all the living, including freedom, so as not to take responsibility for personal position, their decisions, meanings and relationships.

All in the heads

The information war is always organized by someone and directed, by no means on the enemy, but on their own. Own and only they can and should become a resource.

No matter what parties to the conflict. The information war is always winning only for its organizers and losing for everyone else, regardless of the side of the barricades, for they are just a resource. Two opposing "precipitated fortresses" can live only in one - devouring from inside themselves. They have no other way out, they are in self-effect. And with such an outcome, the resource becomes ordinary people who took the worldview of the information war and submitted themselves to a narrow group of beneficiaries. The fact is that the main audience of the information war is its organizers-beneficiaries. Those who are inside the "fortress", no more than "meat".

Therefore, the feature of the information war is that she truly has no participants. There are no the most real "their" and "strangers". There is the same as with the advertising concept of "positioning". Positions, separation and all other exist no more than in the heads. It is clear that, ultimately, there may be only one "precipitated fortress", fighting with voids around.

I think that the victory in the information war does not observe the one who was able to influence the enemy (whom he may not be in reality), but the one who rebuilt the people around him.

The information war is very scarce not only on ideas, meanings, shades. She is scarce and face. War needs only elected and proven persons, only their own preachers and interpreters of the will of the war organizers. Another feature of the war, beating primarily in his own, is the presence of interpreters of knowledgeable and decrypting, interrupting the will and information of the "enemy" and students not to fall on the fishing rod. The same as in the "Fortresses", therefore, receive from all sides only "correct" specially prepared information. From the organizers of information wars, there is no confidence in ordinary people. Their abilities and the right to understand themselves are not taken seriously, through which infantilism is raised, distrust and feeling of guilt.

What is Christianity?

In my opinion, everything is simple. Christians are also people, and most of the people are ordinary, almost like everyone else. And therefore, they are sometimes drawn into "information wars", too, are often happy to live someone else's soulless life, not burdened responsibility, freedom, personal relations. Do not mind some and become a resource for some "higher goals" or against any "enemies". I think all this knows and see. Because the company has an idea of \u200b\u200bChristianity as "one of ...", along with football fans, political parties, nationalists, patriots, etc. And yet, since Christianity is the evangelical evangelism and faith in the Son of God of Jesus Christ , on a certain depth of life, everything should be different.

Whatever information wars, Christians always have a foundation, a kind of rock, on which they are called upon to build a house of their lives. Yes, of course, both the winds and storms fall on this life, and the house may suffer. But he is incumbent and able to protect his inhabitants. This cliff is faith in a living and personal god. Faith is not in nature, not to the state, not to their homeland, not in military power, not in the "enemies". This is faith in God! And this faith reveals his eyes, makes ultimately meaningless any information wars.

Other people for Christians can no longer be a resource and even "enemies." People around, no matter how the monstrous for many may sound, are neighbor, they are brothers and sisters, and if believers, then brothers and sisters in Christ. Each person is unique and valuable. He loves God. Christ suffered on the cross and died, among other things, for our enemies. We do not solve the fate of other people and not to label them. The world is not black and white, but color. Yes, he lies in evil, yes, often reigns sin. But evil and sin are defeated by Christ. There is no, or almost no pure evil and sin. The appeal of Jesus Christ is addressed to all. Until the last sigh, each of us can draw your choice, your will to Christ the Savior.

Life is not a minefield, where the main thing is to avoid danger. Life is more creativity, search, your experience, understanding, personal relationship, it is always a free and personal choice, this is responsible. Life is not a "precipitated fortress", not self-censorship and restriction. This is the trust of God and people, this desire to learn everything in good and good that is found on the way.

There is no clearly unambiguous teachers, interpreters and preachers of truth, except for one teacher - Christ. His words and an example, he himself - truth. The rest - should be referred to as the Gospel.

Christians are designed to live a picture of the world in the head, and even in the form of a chessboard, and above all, relations with live and personal God and people, each of them "near". And this is what you can touch, this is what has real value, this is what is before God, in the end, have to keep the answer. From the court not to leave.

- It is clear that the moral influence of the Church on the Human Souls is favorable and for the country as a whole. After all, the people moral is harder to deceive, enslave and conquer than immoral?

- Naturally, there are many historical confirmations. As soon as the people tends to some sin, for example, to homosexuality, as soon as its moral categories are destroyed, which are determined by the religion, the degradation of society and the destruction of the state begins. Recall the Roman Empire, the ancient Greeks .... In Russia, before the revolution of 1917, where was the edge of revolutionary propaganda? To the nobility, officers and clergy. Although the clergy at the time, too, nothing bad revolutionary did not.

So the external enemies are trying to undermine the confidence of people to the ministers of the Church to prevent her task of moral, spiritual education. For them then it was easier to control the process of moral, intellectual and physical degradation of the people, which is now successfully implemented.

This method of manipulation of consciousness can be considered on a simple example. To involve a teenager in a gangster environment, the first thing they seek to make bandits - to bring the trust of this teenager to your parents and teachers, destroy their authority. They need to somehow bring it out of the influence of those who raise it and teaches. Only after that there is a chance that he will participate with them in all their dirty divishes. Here is such a "waters from under the influence" and is the purpose of the customers of this discrepancy of the church, which now organized an information war against Orthodoxy.

"It seems to me that after all such an external informational influence also finds some kind of inner support in those people who are subject to him. It's not just the usual ignorance

in matters of real life of priests and church life, but also some internal reasons why these people are so willingly take false for the truth.

- Well, of course, there are such reasons. Such "weak points" in man is his inner imperfection, his sins. Peaceful impurity opposes everything moral in the same way as dirty will oppose the washing of the hands, and the lazy student oppose the teachings. The same harmnik or a homosexual cannot accept the church as it is in what it is, because it sets too high moral strips too for them. They can only condemn it and water mud.

When some moral freak becomes hard and uncomfortable among moral and clean people, he will definitely begin to talk about them any nasty to create for himself the illusion of "the same". "But who does not steal in Russia?" - This expression has become already familiar to us. So you can easily steal. "And even animals are engaged in homosexuality, and in general - this is normal!" - Also from a series of self-elections and attempts to make from black white. Now, when the cult of styalism reigns in the country, many have started to declare something like: "A person, by its very essence, is a substantial creature." So it is also normal to have low lifestyards? Then you can create anything!

That is, the church sets a certain plank of relations in human society. And those who live outside of these frames feel uncomfortable. They think that if you destroy the church, then spiritual laws act will cease. But it is not.

- Tell me, how can you explain the killings of priests from the point of view of human psychology? After all, something is the murderers drive? Or nothing but angry intenseness to Orthodoxy, how to someone else's faith?

- Why kill good, pure soul people? Yes, because these murderers of the scum moves not just hate, but hatred caused by black envy. Envy gives birth to hatred, and hides with contempt.

Take such a metaphor: I had a misunderstanding on the Olympics for some science full of ignion, besides evil. And how will he feel in this environment? Of course, he will think or even say: "All you are crazy" nerds "here, all the assholes, one I am normal."

Most of all hate those who are smarter or kindly - those who surpassed you. Because hateing the one who is less than you and is less than you, there is no sense - there is nothing to envy. Consciously or subconsciously, but these haters understand that their priests are higher and cleaner, and that is true on their side, and it feels fit and begin to hate them.

- Some people reproach the priests in the inattention, that they do not pay attention or sharply respond to a given question, they give.

- Of course, the priests are not perfect, because they are also people. It happens that some of them behave in an inappropriate priest: there are inattentive priests, there are priests suffering from condemnation - everyone has their own personal features and disadvantages. So some of them may be reproached quite deservedly. But let's look at the question more wider: if you come to the doctor and see that he has a lot of flaws: he is impatient, Malogramny, does not respond to your questions, does not give advice ... What do you do? Most likely, go to another. He treats one bad - you will find someone who treats well. But because of the inattentive and coarse, you will not stop being treated at all? Do not fight in medicine, as such? So why because of one insufficiently polite priest, some begin to make unreasonable generalizations, and accuse absolutely all the ministers of the church?

By the way, I noticed such a phenomenon: against the priests, as against, for example, foreigners, are massively and aggressive, but why there are no such performances against the oligarchs? It happens, one, the other - and that's it. Silence! No hysteria, like against priests. Although these people each of us stole money. Why is it?

- Maybe there are no such performances against oligarchs in blogs, because for this there are no customers?

- I think it is. You will not be able to finance the information war yourself, therefore there are no disturbances about this.

Now it is already very much written about the information war: how it is organized and is carried out, for which there are these manipulations by the human consciousness, as they occur, what they are based on and so on. For political technologies, a huge number of books are written and easy to find such literature. If someone needs to be lazy - all this information disgrace can be seen on TV, and it has long been possible to understand why it is all invented. But here I'll think too lazy. It flourishes unwillingness and passivity to understand the situation with reasoning type: "Why do I need it?" It is also easier to live - do not strain your intellect, but wait when someone gives you a ready-made solution. 80 percent of people, unfortunately, are arranged at extremely primitive. In their presentation - they are normal, smart people who mean something, but in essence, they are only interested in what they can feel and touch.

- Feel and touch? So they are interested only in material values \u200b\u200band pleasures?

- Yes - what is based on a greater degree in feelings and emotions. Not some global things, not the interests of the people and the state, not an understanding of the world order, nor even the interests of your own soul, but only what serves as the most primitive of your needs. They would just like to live easily and thoughtlessly, get everything you need from life today, and tomorrow - whether it will be.

The recent is indicative. One famous atheistic site announced a promotion of assistance to cancerous children with a slogan: "There is no God, who can help children other than us?" Let's collect money - sacrifice for the treatment of children! Over 20 thousand rubles collected for a half months, and about how much famous Orthodox sites are collected in just 2 hours, although visitors are no more. The atheistic site collected only the crumbs compared to them. Here they themselves and showed themselves who they are by and large are. Because unbelievers in God are mostly egoists.

Egoism is the main factor that does not allow any spiritual one. When "I" - the center of the universe, what kind of priests, what else is God, why do I need these competitors! I am self-sufficient, I don't need any instructions, and in general everything should bow ...

- So the priests became the main target of anti-Russian forces?

- Yes, but they are the target not only of the anti-Russian forces, but first of all the target of dark forces.

Such people have a lot of temptations - more than an ordinary person. And because their life passes in front of everyone, sometimes their shortcomings are hyperbolized by society. For example, if an ordinary person on the car drove to the red light, then no one will surprise this and no one will remember this fact. And if you suddenly see that the uncle was drunk in Ryasa and with a cross on the chest, it would instantly become a reason for emotional conversations. How much do we have, sorry, drinks drinks on the same commemorations, how much do you simply behave at weddings? And who, when does each other retell these antics? But if I saw someone's drunk throat - all, be kindly - here conversations and gossip enough for everyone and for a long time.

Moreover, all such stories for the sake of the red sense are overgrown with the time of the bunch of speculations and fictions and turn in the end in something completely unimaginable. And a little drank priest will already be depicted in absolutely indefinitely ...

I want to bring a quotation suitable for the site from the documentary story of the priest Yaroslav Shipov, who served for a long time at rural parish. This passage is from the relationship of the village people to the priest: "They tirelessly came up with all sorts of rumors: then the father is not good, because rich, and when it turned out that the poor, and this is bad - the real pop can not be a beggar; That - in every village a wife, and if not so, then it hurts strict with women, I could and attention to render: I never know what the priest - a man still ... "

- There is a more educated part of the audience - people who know what a huge positive role played the church in the history of the whole country, especially during the years of testing. Some of them even read spiritual literature. It happens that they say: "That's earlier the church was - yes! And that church that now has become, I can not accept. " How do you comment on such statements?

- In short, such claims can be expressed by the question: modern priests are not saints, so why listen to them and equal to them? You can beat this topic as joking: reaching holiness myself, and the church will be equal to you. Since you can not accept this church, and you know the samples - live on this sample. Show your example with Holy Life. And as soon as you begin to work spiritually, immediately make sure that you have enough sins, and there is nothing to be uncomplicable and impeccable.

- And he will say: "No, I don't want to be holy, I want them to be saints, because this is their business - to be holy" ...

"The saint must be the church and her commandments, because she strives for love and leads to the people. But each of its members to be holy can not be. How can not be a genius every scientist. The church needs to be perceived as a holistic structure, and not judge her for individuals. Follow church commandments, and do not give in to provocations.

It may be morally healthy, if desired, each. And this in man is the main one, because it is in his spiritual qualities a person is. And if, for example, someone from your friends has a sick liver, he does not cease to be your friend from this, because you perceive it in parts, but as a person. In the same way, in the imperfection of individual "organs", the church as a whole does not become incapable.

All these accusations of the priests and the church itself, if it is not an open enmity, most often from inability to understand the main thing: the church does not live for themselves, but for the people and his salvation. And she always performed its functions and performs.

Morgoev Hetag

Information wars today are the main on the planet, and this statement is not news. Also, the victory in the hot war can be turned into a defeat in the subsequent information. Everything is possible in the information war you can turn up the whole story to the legs, convince everyone that black is white and vice versa. Information wars are total and global. Such wars continuously lead states and blocks, various parties, religious confessions, ideologies, etc. We will not be mistaken if we say that information wars exist as much as a person exists.

The information war at the modern level is woven into the mass communication system. The simplest communication model was still identified by Aristotle, it turned on three components: Source - Communication - Recipient. The modern model includes feedback connecting the "recipient" with the "source". In our context, the social status of the source of information is of great importance. For example, the media, having the status of an official source of information, already claim to be the "official" on the fact that only reliable information is reported. However, the truth of the semantic information is difficult to check, so the audience is much more important than the estimated information that purposefully reflects the dominant trends in society. Evaluation information largely contributes to the formation of public opinion, therefore, as a rule, it is controlled and serves as political, ideological, economic and other purposes. Here it is necessary to highlight the regulatory function of mass communication, it is associated with interactive interaction of society control. This function is conjugate with the formation of social consciousness, public opinion, with the creation of social stereotypes, with manipulation, with social control. Creating certain social conditions may determine the use of this function to form various brainwashing technologies. Thus, the media in modern conditions are key, the main tool in manipulating information. With the help of the information, the ruling class, the real owners and customers of the media form a "public" opinion, manipulate the consciousness of the individual, giving it high-quality and value orientations that the individual is necessary for functioning in the system of public relations that, in turn, are set up and form the owners And media customers. In terms of information war, the media are the main, although not the only weapon.

The information war in the field of religious life is most characteristic of the Abrahamic religions, the expansion of which is always the character of war, whether it is hot or at the ideological level. At some historical stage, without the opportunity to wag a physical war, Judaism translated a permanent, without the beginning and end of a religious war, with her terrible initiations of the captured mining to his breeding God, when everything was killed: all people, all animals, all plants, even guns labor was to be destroyed, in the plane of information and psychological war.

Overcoming a narrow ethnoreligious framework, the adepts of one of the Jews sects, the sermon and dogma of which were subsequently called Christianity, also used the methods and opportunities of the information war. Christian essays show the dynamics of changes in the objectification of the Iudochristian sermon. In the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus, calling the apostles, directs them to the sermon, intended exclusively for the Jews: "This twelve sent Jesus and commanded them, saying: do not go to the pagans and do not enter the city of Samaryansky; And go to the dead to the dead sheep at home Israel "(Mat. 10, 5. 6). In the preserved fragments of the Gospel of Ebionites, Jesus talks about the appeal to the preaching of the apostles to the Jews: "... I want you to be the twelve apostles for testimony to Israel" 1 . The need for a wide preaching of the Christian teaching is laid in the speeches of the New Testament Jesus: "And he told them: Go all over the world and preach the gospel of the whole creature" (Mar. 16, 15) "You are the light of the world. The city, standing on the top of the mountain, can not hide. And, burn a candle, do not put it under the vessel, but on the candlestick, and shines in the whole house. So yes, the light shines you before people so that they see your good deeds and glorified the father of our heavenly "(Mat. 5, 14 - 16; Wed. Mat. 10, 26; Mar. 4, 21; Onions. 8, 16; 11 , 33) Next, each apostle is endowed with the knowledge of the "other language" for preaching the testimony of the Resurrection of Jesus. People who were in Jerusalem - witnesses a miracle, as well "... amazed and divided, saying between themselves: this saying is not all Galilean?" (Acts. 2, 7).

It can be said that we are Ossetian throughout the one hundred century already in the state of information war from all kinds of representatives of various religious systems trying to submit us to make an obedient tool (or weapon) to achieve their goals. The conditional "beginning" of this war we can consider Christian legends about allegedly sermons in Scythia of a certain Judeo-Christian preacher Andrei, in the Christian tradition of Andrey, the first-marked student of Jesus Christ, he allegedly reached Kiev (which did not exist then). However, Christian historians themselves themselves do not give any intentional information about Andrei's preaching in the Black Sea and Caucasus countries.

Nowadays, the information war against Ossetians on the part of Christian confession takes various forms and expressions. Having your adepts, residents and how to assume paid agents in the management system and in the media themselves, the church skillfully imposes on, creates the illusion of "good" for the Ossetians of the transition to Christian values \u200b\u200band worldview, but nowhere is not mentioned that this worldview contradicts the basics of Ossetian? Glau and is imposed in order to destroy it. The media in Ossetia is replicated by the ideas about the religious life of the Ossetian people sometimes do not have anything with our history or our religion.

Creating a false myth about the ancient of its cult among our people, in the media, for example, repeatedly repeats something like spells: "Alania officially adopted Christianity in the X century" 2 . The injection of this test is designed to perceive the finished formula, the meaning and meaning of which, I argue, cannot explain its writers. The Christian tradition itself denies the possibility of "official adoption of Christianity" by anywhere, in any age, year or season. In this case, the "distortion of information (from an open lie before the displacement of the concept for the semantic field) allows you to adjust the degree and measure of the psychological impact, to make such an image of reality in which the main thing is not a reality, but however, they want to teach, how to organize what you need see in it » 3 . There is also silent, concealing information, namely, in 931, Alana regarding the Christian faith "... dismantled from her and expelled the bishops and priests sent to them by the Byzantine emperor" 4 . As well as numerous historical examples of the struggle of Alan and Ossetians against Christianity.

It should be clarified by considering the problem of the relationship between the Ossetians and the surrenders of religions, and in particular Christianity, we are dealing with a religious information war, this war is directed against us, but at the same time, it goes for us, for our self-awareness, for our Soul. In this war, the goals and objectives of the Church and the buses are closed, intertwined in the desire to obtain obedient flock and easily manageable mass. This mass is an object of manipulation - the slave majority.

The complication of public life, the strengthening of its contradictions, the uneven distribution of education, culture and information inevitably lead to the formation of "cognitive barriers", to the production, preservation and complication of obstacles that make comprehension by the masses of social and cultural realities. It's more and more difficult for a person in what is happening. Knowledge he prefers his lightweight, ready interpretation provided by the owners of the media. "According to many (researchers - M.Kh.), a modern communication message in its psychological basis is a special kind of myth. In recent decades, the activity of the mass communication is considered as a myth-producing ... The myth-resistance rebuilds the perception and thinking of the audience. A special, clip character of a continuous flow stream dictates a different rate of mental processes. Reducing time for comments and analytical programs leads to the degradation of the thinking of the audience. As a result, it is becoming more and more frequent for the perception of various kinds of myths " 5 . For example, for the perception of the imposed, alogichic, at its essence, the ideas about almost eternal affiliation of Ossetian or Muslim cult.

The influence and formation of the individual and mass of the views on reality by distorting information is an informational and psychological war. As a result of the psychological impact on the intellectual-cognitive sphere, his ideas, the nature of the perception of newly incoming information and, in the end, his "picture of the world" is changing in the direction necessary for the informant. In our conditions, this is a transition from a meaningful, active and proportionate behavior of the necessary in the framework of the traditional Ossetian religious self-consciousness to the simple perception of ready-made dogmas, the teachings of the educational and introduced by the Church, or the finished solutions regarding the most important aspects of the life of the masses of the ruling class. In recently, the individual is removed from the active activity within the framework of religious and public life, he is imposed on the role of a passive observer, the consumer.

In the mass communication system used to actively influence the audience, often, in the case of lighting a religious situation in Ossetia, by direct belfurn and deception, television has an indisputable advantage. It is concluded in its essence, namely, in stock images, video. The overwhelming majority of information (knowledge) a person gets through vision. The dominance of the visual channel also allows you to exaggerate / the denial of the importance of a particular event in public life 6 .

The video, provided by television, simplifies the assimilation of the necessary information, as well as enhances the contextual effect on the mass consciousness of the audience. "This is exactly what gives television exposure to anything incomparable emotional force ... Television is addressed primarily to emotional and directly effective structures. By virtue of this main advantage, television may not just create a popular "effect of presence" from the viewer. Watching the development of events on the television screen, the viewer often identifies itself with an eyewitness or even a participant in the event. This is how the most important psychological effect of identifying teleadiaries with the events and their characters is achieved. Unlike rational logic, there is an emotional "psychological". The television audience has an amazing principle for common sense: "I saw - it means that it is true!" 7 . And the person in Ossetia sees many times repetitive news plots on the activities of the Church, the adepts of Christianity, repeated references in any way or otherwise related to the work of Christian clerics or their flocks, repeated false statements about the origin of Ossetian culture from the Christian cult.

Another feature of the current information promotion of the situation is the total propaganda of debauchery by government agencies through the media in Ossetia (here we can also include outdoor advertising on the streets of cities). Depravate the form of degradation of society as a whole and individual in particular. Such an individual there is no place in the framework of the traditional Ossetian worldview, he falls out of it, becomes contrast to him. Local officials oriented taxpayers for consumer relations to each other, when a person sees in itself a similar tool, but more often just flesh, meat, though well folded and exposed to show excited lust. Thus, officials are preparing for the Church to her flock, which is looking for salvation in the church and sooner or lately calens behind repentance, forgiveness of sins.

One of the most powerful mass communication at the present stage was the Internet. For us, the field of struggle for their self-identification has expanded. Without opportunities, the levers of influence will break through to the audience through the formal media (although they are contained in our tax deductions) We have the likelihood of providing alternative, in our case true information, expand the information space occupied by the subject of our religion or? Gladau. But here the reverse side of this opportunity was the strongest opposition from the forces interested in the destruction of us as an ethnos. A qualitatively new round of the information war with the use of new funds provided by the Internet provides an opportunity for all semi-graphic individuals, "anonymous from comments" slander, insult, create background, Mud and lightening train accompanying educational activities (or at least attempts) people of patriots seeking to keep themselves and their people in the world. Impunity for slander, watering the mud and everything on the Internet broke into a whole subculture and, of course, this circumstance, this background, this subculture is used for information wars in large players, up to states and, of course, all sorts of ideological formations such as church. It should be noted that this background itself is also a war and war not only to sing and Wan, Azamatov and Sarmatov with each other, but also the ideological information war for the right to self-identification.

There is no doubt that some part of these anonymous nicknames are working under singing and Van agents of certain or others (it is not difficult to guess what) structures working in order to fine and prolocably direct the flows of dirt in the right to the owners of the direction. First of all, against those who fight with their ideology or exposes some of their non-resident action. Without being able to refute the arguments of the ideological opponent, when it is impossible to refute them, it is easier for or another way to obstore, delineate, make silence.

Information, ideological war, whose participants we are all, is aware of this someone or not, aimed at concealing the truths themselves about our history and culture, aimed at distorting real facts about our religious life, it still has a clear The potential, as the value and purpose for us are the truth and this is our advantage. "For there is nothing secret that there would be no obvious nor intimate, which would not have done well-known and would not find it." (Bow. 8, 17).

Notes:

1 fragments of the gospel of the Ebionites / apocrypha of ancient Christians. M., 1989. P. 66.

3 Kaladarov K. X. Recipient with public consciousness. The role of communicative processes.

4 Al-Masudi / Alean A. Alans in ancient and medieval written sources. M. 2003, p. 346.

5 Olshansky D.V. Psychology. Spb. 2001, p. 300 - 301.

6 Pospeils G. How "switchable" peoples psychological / information transactions as technology impact on mass consciousness in the twentieth century

7 Olshansky D.V. Psychology. Spb. 2001, p. 304.

Like a fire in the shopping center "Winter Cherry" was used for informational strike

The tragedy in Kemerovo proved that, together with rescuers and investigators in the Siberian city, covered by horror and despair, the specialists of a special kind were also to arrive - according to the information wars. They were stranged sharply. The gaping emptiness was very quickly filled: First, the Ukrainian provocateur called city morgues and warned about the three hundred dead, it was immediately picked up the BBC and Radio Freedom, "Khodorkovsky, headquarters of Navalny and popular Russian bloggers who have millions And hundreds of thousands of subscribers. And then tens of thousands of people (both ordinary users and ordinary fighters of the information front) began to overclock the lies on social networks and blogs, telling that the power is lying and in fact the victims of the fire in the shopping and entertainment center "Winter Cherry" are many times more official data, and most of the dead are children.

Pieces of lies crowded in numerous Kemerovo groups "Vkontakte" and unsubscribed people fighting by a terrible incident, forcing them to believe in the unheard of the tragedy, in what they hide the truth about the happening and "in fact" in the "winter cherry" burned And 64 people suffocated, including 41 children, and three, four, five hundred Kemerovo.

At the same time, Russian opposition media signs out the headlines "the authorities hide the number of victims in Kemerovo," how many dead actually? The authorities are hidden, "they say that hundreds of people died in Kemerovo, and the authorities hide", "The residents of Kemerov are confident that the authorities hide the real number of dead" - and this wave splashed again into social networks, only with reference to the press.

The following letter appeared "Letter Kemerovo", in which the allegedly local resident reported that "today Kemerovo Morgor reported the absence of places and bags for corpses, speaking that the number of dead passed for 300 people, among which 142 children." Photography from the Odessa House of Trade Unions went to move, where on May 2, 2014 people were buried alive by the Ukrainian national radicals: people were preparing to believe that these are pictures of the dead Kemerovo.

Foreign media also did not disguise the replication of lies. So, German Spiegel, bringing the data of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of those killed in Kemerovo, said that "residents of the city suggest that the death toll may be more than officials". The Washington Post, publishing a great report about the Kemerovo rally on March 27, wrote that "many of the demonstrators doubt the official count of 64 dead, arguing that their number is much higher." The same told the same BBC service: "Many demonstrators stated that they do not trust the authorities and do not believe that the declared number of dead is accurate."

March 28, after the EMERCOM of Russia made an official statement that the final number of fire victims in the Winter Cherry shopping center was installed - 64 people, on the Radio Liberty website, "another publication of the Kemerovo rally with the" main issue "appeared : How many people died? "Official figure in 64 dead in Kemerovo, no one believes, and the first argument: in the 550-thousandth city, almost everyone has at least one dead familiar or relative," Freedom is lying on a blue eye, leading as "facts" The stories of a woman who does not call their surname, and a random passerby, from a familiar, according to him, the fire was covered with the lives of relatives. Immediately, on the square, tells the "Radio" Freedom "," the headquarters was created, "which began to record the surnames of the dead and missing", counted 86 people by the end of the day. As it turned out when checking, many surnames and names were taken, which is called, from the ceiling, no data about themselves left the applicants.

It should be noted, the Russian service "Radio" Freedom "" went very far, taking over all the most terrible rumors who have nothing to do with the truth: about "testimonies" of doctors and rescuers, about hidden dead bodies, about hundreds of freshly burned graves ... At the time of publication it was perfectly known that the initiative groups of Kemerovchan examined the morgues and cemeteries and did not find those who were hidden from the eyes of the public of the dead or harvested graves. However, this "free press" was silent.

It is well known that in addition to financing the same Russian service "Radio" Freedom "" US allocate significant funds to the support of the Russian opposition and countering "Russian propaganda" in other countries, for example in Ukraine. Events in Kemerovo showed how this money work - and Kemerovo, and all Russia survived in the days of the tragedy, the most powerful informational strike, the purpose of which was to shake the Siberian city to the rebellion, and then tie to protests other regions, including Moscow. Panic moods injected intentionally and coordinated: the mistake will assume that the attack developed by itself, randomly. Sources of false information, even if they undertake actions on their own, whether the Ukrainian Creator of Fakes Volnov or the former head of Yukos Khodorkovsky was a single network, the "cells" of which were included in the work at the right moment. First, the lie about the inconsistency of official statistics "real" number of victims was designed in Ukraine, then this lie suffered thousands of "cells" into the world; Oppositionists, Hype lovers and their own ratings were replicated in blogs in blogs, this sought the media of a certain variety, and there were already dozens of social networks, if not hundreds of thousands of "cells". Everything that Kemerovo's Kemerovo and rescuers said, tone in lies flows.

If one would reflect it from the start of this attack, many people not only in Kemerovo, but also in other corners of Russia, crushed by the tragedy, would not succumb to the information panic. However, no popular blogger was found in Kemerovo, who could answer the false reports to the networks accelerated on the networks from the scene. More precisely, such bloggers were, but they also decided to "cut the Haip" on the topic of hundreds of those killed. Famous Kemerovo "Nemmagi" took advantage of the moment and began to distribute Bedding about how "it was 157 and called now, they said to cook for another 80 people, from adults there are only less than 30," "all the morgues are littered", "there are dead inside About 400 people, 355. Now they, of course, write: "Countrymen, I am ashamed of you", "This is your city and these people you see every day, and could provide adequate facts, and not this slag", "What you should go to the scene to survey Witnesses, call the police, morgue, orphanage, enter the initiative group and with it to check the morgues and the cold processing plant? Accurately analyze all the information. Draw conclusions. But no, why? "," You guys are not a man, inside the rot. You had to be on the front. " But - 2.9 million views! Most - in the very terrible days, when the truth was touulated in the sea lies.

This information on Natisk has not achieved its goal. Thanks to many people and events: the initiative group of Kemerovo, who rushed in place to seek the truth, checking the morgues and cemeteries; administrators of Kemerovo groups in social networks that cut off rumors, publishing only reliable information about the fire in the "Winter Cherry" shopping center; president who came to Kemerovo; slow but hard artillery of federal media; psychologists of the Ministry of Emergency Situations and medicine disasters working with relatives of the dead; inserted on his knees at the rally official; The hundreds of bloggers who did not dance on the bones were not believed to Khodorkovsky, bulk, "free press", "Nevagiam" and began to rake a lies.

However, this tactical victory means that on the other side of the information barricades will make conclusions. And the following attacks will be more evil, faster, more accurate. It is unacceptable to count on the capitulation of the enemy.

Arina Tsukanova

Vardan Ernestovich Bagdasaryan - D.I., Prof., Deputy. Head of the Center for Scientific Political Thought and Ideology

The issues of the submitted study is determined by the contextual environment of the last four years. The content of the historical context is determined by the scanning of the active phase of a new information and psychological war against Russia. The Russian Orthodox Church was in the focus of this information attack. It is necessary to understand, first of all, what causes this focus.

Even in the early 1990s, Zbignev Brzezinsky proclaimed: "After the wise of communism, our most important enemy is Russian Orthodoxy." Today, some is questioned by the accuracy of this statement. But even the recognition of the objections of skeptics, little changes in the overall content of Western political discourse. Let us turn, in particular, to recent statements by the Minister of Foreign Affairs, the former Premiere of Sweden Charles Bildt: "Orthodoxy is the main threat to Western civilization ... The new anti-Western and Anti-Tenta line Putin relies on deeply conservative Orthodox ideas." It is emphasized that this statement is either a political scientist, but a valid policy, an official.

Why exactly Orthodoxy is declared after dismantling communism the main enemy of the West?

The death of the former, the Soviet system of statehood correlated with the process of detentification. Initially, communism was disavowed, as a global project, then was destroyed by civilization identity, expressed at that time with the Marker "Soviet people", then - socially group identities. (Fig. 1). The degradation process was brought to elementary social connections. In fact, this state means in perspective the death of society. It is possible to exit an anomia through the nomination of a new, collecting society of ideology. Through it, the matrix of recreation of the level system of the identities of Russia will be asked.

Fig. 1. The process of destruction of identities in modern Russia

Accordingly, the geopolitical opponents of Russia should prevent the nomination of any new assembly ideological projects. From here, any doctrines can be discredited that could be taken as the basis of the new Russian assembly.

The most powerful position in Russian society from all potential patriotic ideologies has an Orthodox project. Its from all the options articulated today supports the majority. Other patriotic projects generate unacceptable threats within themselves. The Eurasian project comprises a threat to the Asiatiization of Russia, the project of Russian nationalism - an interethnic war and the collapse of the country, the non-social project - materialism and dedicationalization. All of these threats occur in hypertrophies of certain valid principles in the foundation of these ideologies. But hypertrophy can be avoided.

In conjunction with the Orthodox project, each of these threats is removed. The presence in the kernel of the Orthodox version of history and culture prevents the threat of the country's aassization. The Christian value platform does not allow, in turn, the nationalist-tribal roll of ideological construction. The religious basis of the new ideology does not finally translate it into the format of materialism and dedicationalization. It is Orthodoxy that turns out to be the main potential integrator for Russia. This is obviously well understood by Russian opponents, which determines the information attack on the ROC, started at exactly while at the level of the country's leadership they started the restoration of spiritual fastening of statehood. (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Ideological projects of the revival of Russia

Of course, the new ideological project of Russia should not be a draft of original regional existence. Fighting the enemy should be at the global level, which only gives the prospect of victory. Regionalization contradicts the very meaning of Christianity, as the religion facing no one people, but to humanity as a whole. Does the potential of such an appeal have modern Orthodoxy? The fixation of countries in the share of the Orthodox population shows that such potential exists. In this area there are also countries that are not attributed to the traditional borders of the spread of Orthodoxy. From here - the possibility of an offensive position in the ideological plan. (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3. Map of the spread of Orthodoxy in the world

Orthodoxy is superior. It is a majority religion for 44 peoples of the world. These nations represent 9 language families. So in the global geopolitical situation, the initial positions of the Orthodox project for global presentation exist. (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4. "Tree" of Orthodox peoples

And the information attack is being made at Orthodoxy. Its sweep is dated 2012, actually coinciding with the apogee of the Belolant Movement. The nature of the information attack unfolded against Orthodoxy gives the representation of the content analysis of the titles of articles in the media and the Internet. Here are some typical wording:

• "About Orthodoxy Brain"
  "Orthodox nationalism"
  "Salilovs piety"
  "Tale of corruption in rotten subsoils of the ROC"
  "ROC is corruption and inefficiency"
  "Gifts of wolves and a new era of enlightenment"
  "Orthodox chorugvossess against sewer hatches"
  "Orthodox hooligans"
  "Orthodox Checkers"
  "Church Imperialism"
  "Rashimism - Orthodox fascism"
  "Orthodox Taliban"
  "The wicked union of the Orthodox Church with Putin"
  "Patriarch Kirill - Religious Support of Putin's Nationalism"
  Assessment of the combination of these headlines can only be one - "War".

The information and psychological war, according to the theory of the wars of a new type, is conducted at several levels - information, conceptual and paradigmal. Turning from one level to another, a cognitive subordination of the addressee of obtaining information is carried out. Consider this chain on the example of a scandal with "Pussy Riot". A provocation is arranged, the result of which is a criminal punishment by the punk rocker. This is the initial information level of the struggle: massive challenge information about the punishment of girls. Next, the transition to the concept level. For this transition, it is proposed to answer - why were the girls in prison? The answer is because the RPC is against freedom of speech. The question is why the ROC against freedom of speech - leads to the third paradigm level. The answer is because Orthodoxy Totalitarian religion. The sentence against the Orthodox Church, and through it and the whole Russian civilization it turns out. (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5. Levels of information and psychological war

The theoretical foundations of the sentence are developed in the Western ideological space for quite a long time. We give the statements of two recognized in the West, as well as in the liberal part of Russian society, as specialists in the history of Russia of American historians and political scientists - Richard Pipes and Walter Lacher. The similarity of their biographies is both immigrants from Poland - shows the principle of coordination of personnel in the West in the information struggle against Russia.

Richard Pipes.: "What could be realistic to expect from the Russian church? Because of its conservative philosophy and traditional dependence on state power, she could not act as a liberalizing force. But she could make two important things. First of all, she could defend the principle of the coexistence of secular and spiritual power, nominated in the Gospel of Matthew (22: 16-22) and in detail developed in the theory of the Byzantine Church ... without having done this, it allowed the state to claim power both above the human body and Over his mind, and thus he strongly contributed to the ugly swelling of secular power in Russia at the time and even moreover in the subsequent era.

Secondly, she could have proudly raised heads to make a struggle for the most elementary Christian values \u200b\u200b... However, she did not do any other (with the exception of isolated cases) and behaved as if she was not affected by the restoration of the filthy justice. No branch of Christianity treated with such indifference to the manifestations of social and political injustices. Ultimately, the policy of the Russian Orthodox Church not only discredited in the eyes of everyone who treated social and political justice, but also produced a spiritual vacuum filled with secular ideologists seeking to create a paradise in this world, which Christianity promised in the world. "

Walter Laker: "Most Christian churches (not only in Russia) on the threshold of the century for conservative, right-wing parties. The historical reasons for this are obvious: the church is not just closely identified with the political establishment, but was part of it; The interests and ideology of the church and the establishment completely coincided. Those who challenged the existing system were rationalists, atheists, the enemies of the Church and the state. True, in each country there were far-sighted church figures, who understood that if the church wishes to preserve influence, it should keep up with the times, and this, due to the rapid changes in society and culture, demanded church reforms ... The identity of the church and the state is not anywhere It was proclaimed so loud as in Russia: the Orthodox Church was the servant of the royal regime ... the ideology of the extreme right in Russia was largely based on the provisions of religion. "

From fixing warfare against Orthodoxy on three cognitive levels, it follows that the response should be carried out in the level system. Along with the information counteraction, the opposition is also necessary and the conceptual and paradigmal. Conceptually, the meaning of the modern struggle against Orthodoxy and Russia should be conceptually disclosed. Paradigmally - the meaning of world history in the coordinate system of good-evil. In the Arsenal of the Information and Psychological War against Orthodoxy there are various techniques, unlimited by the method of direct, "windy" attacks. The destruction of the Orthodox Continuum involves the deposition of a strike on its spatial and historical and time perspective.

The spatial angle is expressed in the formation of barriers to a potential association. It is obvious that the perspective of ideological assembly on the basis of Orthodoxy should be, according to the logic of the war, is opposed to a strataghem of making a split into the Orthodox world. The fact that this is done and, moreover, has reached certain results indicate events in the post-Soviet space. The two most acute conflicts of Russia of recent times - with Georgia and Ukraine. Both these states are not only the former republics of the USSR, but also the community of Orthodox identity. The attitude of the Georgian and Ukrainian population to Russia, as well as Russian - to Georgia and Ukraine, as a result of these conflicts deteriorated significantly. The result is the actually created obstacle to the implementation of the Orthodox reintegration project. (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6. Ukraine and Georgia in the estimates of Russians

The historical and temporary perspective consists in the destruction of a single, holistic canvas of the history of Orthodoxy and, in particular, the history of the ROC. For this, various kinds of historical myths are produced, aimed at deavavating the Orthodox Church in the past. We list the most popular from myths circulating in modern information space:

• the myth of the peripheralness of Byzantium;
  the myth of the Byzantine totalitarianism;
  myth about the pelo culture;
  the myth of the support of the Church of the Goldenopa Hanov;
  the myth about the violent Christianization of the peoples of the Volga region, the North and Siberia;
  myth about the "Russian Inquisition" of the XV-XVI centuries;
  the myth of the preferences of the Orthodox population in Russia;
  the myth of the elections organized by the Church to Russian Science and Culture;
  the myth of the absence of the ROC authority among the people;
  myth about the organization of the Church of Anti-Semitic Pogroms;
  myth on the support of the ROC of the State Repressive Policy
  the myth of the mass cooperation of clergy with the fascists in the occupied territories;
  myths, disavowing individual Orthodox saints.

In the aggregate, these mythologies cover actually the entire history of Orthodoxy. There is no period that would not be detached.

At the same time, attempts are made to the conceptual revision of Russian history. The history of Orthodoxy in Russia actually coincides with the history of Russian statehood. In this regard, Russian civilizational genes turns out to be a historical expression by the Orthodox value matrix. It is not by chance that the founders of the civilization approach label Russia as "Orthodox Civilization". Accordingly, the change in the scale of Russian history leads to the emasculation of the value in it of the Orthodox factor. Two - liberal approach is fixed - the labeling and non-self-omission is fixed - their expansion.

In the liberal version since 1991, the history of New Russia began. The load of the past, expressed, including the Orthodox traditions, should be in the understanding of the liberals to be discharged for the breakthrough to the future.

Neo-language, on the contrary, the Russian history minimize. Such a depreciation may seem at first glance an expression of patriotic aspirations. What would seem to be a reason for national pride to see his state in the list of the most ancient civilizations of the world?! But with this scaling, the Orthodox period turns out to be no more than an episode in the thousands of Russian history. Accordingly, the immanent of Orthodoxy to the Russian civilization is rejected by Russian civilization. Russian civilization is proposed to reconstruct, naturally, not at the Orthodox, but a pagan platform. (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7. Orthodox and opposing views on history

Information campaign against the ROC, must be recognized, gave its results. This records various sociological polls. According to a survey of the Levada Center for 2012, only 13% of the population believes that the criticism of the church hierarchs is caused by the desire of opponents of the Russian national revival to humiliate the church, weaken its union with the authorities and the people. The majority sees the reason in the church itself - its maintenance of the interests of the current power (25%), the desire for earthly benefits (16%), growing conservatism and aggressive fundamentalism (7%), the rejection of freedom (6%). A total of 54% of respondents against 13% supporting the church supported the total anti-skewer position.

In comparison of the monitoring data of the Levada Center for 2012 with similar surveys of 2001 and 2005, a fall in the prestige of the church in society was discovered. Decreased by 10% of the respondents who give the answer - "definitely yes" to the question - should the Church should influence the adoption of state decisions. The share of persons responsible for "definitely yes" decreased by 8%, on the issue - should Russian authorities be guided in their actions with religious beliefs? The number of respondents decreased by 5% indicating a "very important role" of religion in their lives. Somewhat increased the number of opponents of teaching the "Fundamentals of Religion" at school. Also increased the number of opponents of the introduction of tax in Russia for the needs of religious communities. (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8. The results of anti-church propaganda in Russia. Levada Center survey data (2012)

The data of the Levada Center correlate with the 2013 survey data of the WTCIOM. According to him, less than half of Russians believes that Orthodoxy was more often a driving force for the development of Russia. At the same time, 30% denies at all any influence of Orthodoxy for Russia, and 9% defines its negative. In comparison with 2009, according to VTsIOM, the proportion of respondents who consider the provisional intervention of the Church to the state of the state. Only half of the population supported the position of the inadmissibility that a person who confesses the religion other than Orthodoxy was to be at the head of Russia. (Fig. 9).

Fig. 9. Orthodoxy in the representations of Russians (VTsIOM survey, 2013)

All these figures indicate that the information struggle is playing. If you do not take appropriate efforts to change the situation, a new war against Russia and Orthodoxy can be lost.

Tent of Ukrainian Uniats on the Maidan in Kiev 2014

Russian Orthodoxy is in the focus of attacks in postmida Ukraine. One after another reports about the invasion of extremists into Orthodox churches, persecutions for clergymen are coming.

Are these attacks random? Valentin Nalivechenko, Chairman of the Security Service (SBU), said that the ideology of Russia in the "Hybrid War" against Ukraine - "Orthodox Fundamentalism". In fact, the thesis of Orthodoxy is repeated, as the main thing, after the overthrow of communism, the enemy of the West. "They," the head of the SBU explained, "they raised the whole generation of the Russian military who are confident that in Ukraine you need to destroy Ukrainians - those who have other opinions and lifestyle than in their profascious and Eurasian imagination. The danger is that it is approved as a new wave of Orthodoxy - Orthodox Fundamentalism. " Repetition at the level of the Ukrainian leadership of Formula Z. Burezinsky testifies once again about the design nature of the revolution in Ukraine.

The use of the Marker "Orthodox Fundamentalism" is also one of the techniques of cognitive manipulations. The concept of fundamentalism in information flows of recent years was tightly tied to Islam. Islamic fundamentalism was presented, in turn, in fact, as a synonym for terrorism. Accordingly, the appearance of the concept of "Orthodox Fundamentalism" implied his relationship with terrorist practice. In fact, Orthodoxy, as previously Islam, is charged that it is the ideology of terrorism. (Fig. 10).

Fig. 10. Marker "Orthodox Fundamentalism" in the Information and Psychological War against Russia

And what on the other side? What is the elite of Maydan Ukraine in a religious plan? Wide incorpority of representatives of various religious sects and minorities is well known. A pool of a certain "quasi-religious international" is formed. You can give a more rigid definition - "Satanism". (Fig. 11).

Fig. 11. Religious Call Maidan

Of particular attention is the increased popularity in Ukraine of the neo-language movement "Rune-faith". In essence, it is an ideological banner of new Ukrainian nationalism. Similarly, at one time, Aryan neo-dockey was used in Nazi Germany. Officially, as the ideology of the Third Reich, it was never proclaimed. But in fact, it was based on the basis of neo-language, new ideological construction was carried out, and, above all, with respect to German youth.

The fact that Ukrainian neo-dockey is the Western project is quite obvious. The movement originated in the Ukrainian Diaspora of Canada and the USA. The first community was registered in 1966 in Chicago. The headquarters of the movement and today is not at all in Ukraine, but in the city of Spring Glen State New York. The activist movement was, in particular, Katerina Chumachenko, born in the United States, the future spouse of the first Maidan leader Viktor Yushchenko. (Fig. 12).

Fig. 12. Genesis of Ukrainian neo-language

The ideological origins of Russian neo-language are the same. The German neo-language Ariosophy was adapted after the war by Russian emigrants. In the Russian emigrant environment, the first associations are created, popularizing the pre-Christian pagan Rus. The claim for the global audit of the history of ancient Russia was presented, in particular, in the Western Western Western Labor, which settled in Canberra, Sergey Forest (Sergey Yakovlevich Paramonov). In the contextial period, the neo-language movement transfers its activities in the USSR. It forms one of the directions of the dissident. Over time, the struggle against the communist ideology is replaced by the installation of the fight against Orthodoxy. In fact, the movement of neo-language nationalism in Russia has been formed to date. The Russian "Run-Vera" appears the Russian Run-Vera. The use of Russian neo-language in the same quality as Ukrainian neu-language was used on Maidan, should be considered as a real perspective in attempts to organize the "Color Revolution" in Russia. (Fig. 13).

Fig. 13. Idea origins of neo-language in Russia

The information war has discovered the fact at the present stage, it would seem impossible earlier than the Alliance of Liberal Western and Nazism. According to Orthodoxy, shots from two flanks are applied simultaneously. Western liberalism is fighting Orthodoxy as a fastening of Russian civilization. Nazism, in turn, is struggling with Orthodoxy as an assistant (overed) teaching. In principle, there is nothing fundamentally in this struggle. The deep sources of the liberal-western trend on Orthodoxy are claims to the global universalism affiliated in the West religions. The origins of the same anti-blatasted position of Nazism are associated with an ancient confrontation of Christianity in the face of tribal paganism. (Fig. 14).

Fig. 14. Opponents of Orthodoxy. Why are liberals unite with the Nazis?

And we will return to the starting historical point again - the collapse of the USSR.

The Soviet state was not a state Christian. The ideology of the USSR officially relied on an atheistic worldview. However, in the value attitude, the Soviet society was kept largely on the tradition of Christian morality remained on the inertia. With the collapse of the USSR, the illusion arose from the part of the church groups of the population that desnets will lead Russia to the Christian revival. And indeed, the religious life during this period was legitimized. However, the new stage of destruction of the value foundations of the Russian society is discovered for decolation, its dehristianization opens.

A shock is applied by historically formed on the basis of Christian culture values. (Fig. 15).

Fig. 15. Decovenetization as the first stage of dehristianization

And this challenge has not only attitude towards Russia. The West is already dehristanized. Gay parades, militant hedonism, a legalized global market system - all these typical signs of a built new model of life are clearly dissected with Christian world-world.

Russia's dehristianization would mean in these conditions actually the final point of the historical "Evangelical Project". Doesn't it go to this? Do not reveal the depths of the ontological, transcendental struggle today, which was stated in the great religious revelations of the past.